Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Moonshiners and ProhibitionistsThe Battle over Alcohol in Southern Appalachia$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Bruce E. Stewart

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780813130002

Published to Kentucky Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.5810/kentucky/9780813130002.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM KENTUCKY SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.kentucky.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The University Press of Kentucky, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in KSO for personal use (for details see http://www.kentucky.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 December 2017

“Wilt Thou Send the Revenues down upon the Distillers” A Political History of Prohibition, 1882–1908

“Wilt Thou Send the Revenues down upon the Distillers” A Political History of Prohibition, 1882–1908

Chapter:
(p.189) 8 “Wilt Thou Send the Revenues down upon the Distillers” A Political History of Prohibition, 1882–1908
Source:
Moonshiners and Prohibitionists
Author(s):

Bruce E. Stewart

Publisher:
University Press of Kentucky
DOI:10.5810/kentucky/9780813130002.003.0009

At the end of the nineteenth century, it appeared that the campaign for statewide prohibition had run out of steam throughout the US. To renew interest in the issue, many temperance organizations decided to shift their strategy from advocating for statewide prohibition to campaigning for the enactment of local referenda that banned the sale of alcohol. Crusaders believed that these laws would bring their neighbors face-to-face with the obstinate saloon and eventually convince them to accept prohibition on a broader scale. However, it soon became clear to mountain highlanders that federal liquor taxation, local-option ordinances, and alcohol dispensaries were ineffective in solving the region's liquor problem. Although they were concerned that statewide prohibition would infringe on the rights of alcohol producers and destroy an important local industry, the highlanders finally acknowledged that it was the only viable solution. In May 1908, western North Carolina, which has often been depicted as the land of intemperance and moonshining, garnered the highest percentage of votes in favor of prohibition than anywhere else in the state.

Keywords:   North Carolina, statewide prohibition, intemperance, moonshining, mountain reformers, federal liquor taxation, local-option, alcohol dispensary

Kentucky Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .