Abstract
This book uses the history of Breathitt County, Kentucky, to examine political violence in the United States and its interpretation in media and memory. From the 1870s until the early twentieth century, Breathitt County was considered a hotbed of interpersonal, or interfamilial, “feud” violence—a tendency that Americans associate with preindustrial “primitive” populations outside of their society as well as with their native “mountain white” population of Appalachia. Violence in Breathitt County, during and after the Civil War, usually reflected what was going on elsewhere in Kentucky and the American South. In turn, the types of violence recorded there corresponded with discernible political scenarios. Some, especially during the war and Reconstruction, involved challenges to the local power structure embodied by the Democratic Party (in the same manner as in the rest of the South). However, most of the more successful, conclusive uses of violence defended this power structure, maintaining a local version of the white-dominated, capitalistic, one-party rule that defined the New South. Meanwhile, Breathitt County's practitioners of violence benefited from Americans’ abiding reluctance to scrutinize political violence. Blood feuds, a common Victorian popular culture motif, suggested a primordial European past, while also suggesting that violence is acted out reciprocally between equal parties and is essentially apolitical. “Feud” provided a ready cultural explanation for killing that helped observers avoid acknowledging the ways in which “Bloody Breathitt” comprised not an aberration from the national status quo, but rather an epitome of a phenomenally violent country.
Get help with access
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.