Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Mind of EmpireChina's History and Modern Foreign Relations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher A. Ford

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780813192635

Published to Kentucky Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.5810/kentucky/9780813192635.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM KENTUCKY SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.kentucky.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The University Press of Kentucky, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in KSO for personal use.date: 16 June 2021

Conceptual Currents

Conceptual Currents

Chapter:
(p.235) 15 Conceptual Currents
Source:
The Mind of Empire
Author(s):

Christopher A. Ford

Publisher:
University Press of Kentucky
DOI:10.5810/kentucky/9780813192635.003.0016

The Confucian doctrine disliked and distrusted legal mechanisms, and it discouraged the use of civil law to settle disputes among people. Hence, the Westphalian notions of systemic pluralism and international legal rules of conduct based on the idea of sovereign rights were alien to the Confucian worldview. Particularly in a world order the natural contours of which were presumptively hierarchical and virtuocratic, it was just as discomfiting for rulers to assert their rights against each other as it was for individuals to resort to litigation against each other. Without completely departing from ancient antecedents in its effort to return the country to its rightful place in the global system, twentieth-century Chinese nationalism found itself attached to Western-derived concepts of the territorial nation state as a means to further China's development and restoration. Faced with the realization that it was merely one of the participants—and a comparatively weak one at that—in an international system built around the paradigm of Westphalian sovereignty, China developed a concept of horizontal order using its own preunification history during the Warring States period as a conceptual model. With Chinese political discourse already thick with idioms from ancient statecraft, modern Chinese writings on statecraft, strategy and international politics are particularly rich with analogies to the preunification period.

Keywords:   Chinese Communist Party, Confucianism, Westphalian system, imperial power, international law, pluralism, sovereign rights, territorial integrity, Chinese nationalism, Warring States period

Kentucky Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .