Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Mind of EmpireChina's History and Modern Foreign Relations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher A. Ford

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780813192635

Published to Kentucky Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.5810/kentucky/9780813192635.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM KENTUCKY SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.kentucky.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The University Press of Kentucky, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in KSO for personal use.date: 28 June 2022

Sinic Universalism in Theory and Practice

Sinic Universalism in Theory and Practice

Chapter:
(p.79) 6 Sinic Universalism in Theory and Practice
Source:
The Mind of Empire
Author(s):

Christopher A. Ford

Publisher:
University Press of Kentucky
DOI:10.5810/kentucky/9780813192635.003.0007

During the Spring and Autumn and the Warring States periods, China displayed some balance-of-power characteristics similar to those seen in the later European state system. However, the warring states lacked what scholars identified as a “commitment to legacy” and a system of “shared values,” and their concept of self seems to have been less that of emergent, permanent separate nations than that of rival contenders in a winner-take-all struggle for imperial supremacy. The cardinal principle of the Chinese states system thus crystallized as one of resisting hegemony by anyone else and, in effect, seeking it without help. Better even than mere hegemony, moreover, was the geopolitical Holy Grail of achieving outright unification under a state's own banner. Hence, the underlying ethos of the Chinese system during the Warring States period was universalist, and this precluded the development of an explicitly international conception of legitimate political order. Furthermore, because of its marked isolation during its formative years, China viewed itself as “the only civilized society” and considered those beyond its borders as mere barbarians, who should be “rejected as animals.” This form of racism provided an additional set of reasons why relations of formal equality with barbarian rulers were simply out of the question.

Keywords:   Sinic universalism, balance of power, unification, world order, sovereign equality, imperial diplomacy

Kentucky Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .