Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Mind of EmpireChina's History and Modern Foreign Relations$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Christopher A. Ford

Print publication date: 2010

Print ISBN-13: 9780813192635

Published to Kentucky Scholarship Online: September 2011

DOI: 10.5810/kentucky/9780813192635.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM KENTUCKY SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.kentucky.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright The University Press of Kentucky, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in KSO for personal use.date: 28 June 2022

Engagement and Status Conflict

Engagement and Status Conflict

Chapter:
(p.121) 8 Engagement and Status Conflict
Source:
The Mind of Empire
Author(s):

Christopher A. Ford

Publisher:
University Press of Kentucky
DOI:10.5810/kentucky/9780813192635.003.0009

During the first Sino-British conflict, also known as the Opium War, there existed an ideological competition between Sinic universalism and a European-derived diplomatic worldview that continued to flare on multiple fronts long after specific opium-related trade disputes had been resolved by force of English arms. The British, well aware of the degree to which China sought to demand symbolic tokens of subjection from foreign barbarians, sought to achieve a resolution of the disputes at issue using its naval and military forces. After the British made quick work of the resistance offered by the Qing dynasty, China in 1842 agreed to sign the Treaty of Nanking, marking the first treaty unequivocally to place China on equal footing, formally speaking, with another kingdom. Taking their lead from the British, other Western powers, including the US, France, Sweden, and Norway, quickly lined up for their own treaties with China. Through their treaties, these Western powers insisted on a permanent representation in China, something that the Chinese strongly resisted because it “ran counter to the whole political and social system of Imperial China.” For them, such diplomatic relations directly threatened the authority of the emperor. In an effort to preserve what it could of its ancient symbolic supremacy, China's policy after 1860 became one of fending off actual imperial audiences while seeking to revise the treaties to remove the offending provisions that required such encounters.

Keywords:   Sino-British conflict, Opium War, Sinic universalism, imperal supremacy, Treaty of Nanking, diplomatic relations, international order, trade agreements, equality of status

Kentucky Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .